It seems, unfortunately, that the lack of employment is no longer considered a circumstance to which any person who provides services to another is optionally subject, not an economic phenomenon that has an effect on the welfare of nations, joblessness is today personal drama that marks the lives of people and leaves traces, often irreversible, in Being.
It is witnessing an overwhelming traffic on the valuation of things: more and more people considered to have value as have a job.
Employment has become a way to measure the meaning of life. She takes one or the other direction depending on the particularities of Employment turn, and if necessary even longer makes sense as that does not exist. The "biography" of people is evaluated in terms of the jobs it has played and is valued according to the importance each has had hypothetically. The "resume" a person is made of 80% of your work history.
Not that anyone had imposed this way of seeing things, or that the system established as a result of its development. This view of life emerges from the people themselves are the ones who ultimately decide that things are. Then they blame the system themselves, others or life by misfortunes that happen.
This does not mean, of course, that government systems are free from blame or liability, or that life is essentially a "bed of roses". Pass through every joint and contingencies posed by the existence is not simple, and effective governance systems are not only imperfect, they are also bad in many ways. However, from these findings to justify a life full of sorrows and frustrations of "no job" it is a huge blunder.
The Employment does not determine in any way the value of a person! , Job performance does not qualify for Life. Employment (if any) is a consequence of the value of a person, an effect of the ability to contribute something valuable to others. Employment is not a starting point, it is one that eventually you get as aresult of that "someone" does just what it is worth a person, either in terms of their knowledge, skills, abilities or whatever use. People have specific value before (if any) have a job, while you are exercising and after they no longer possess. Understand that life does not call his creatures only to constitute a huge workforce and then rest in peace, not only a moral imperative, it is an existential demand.
And has good size that improper practice of educating children from birth in order that they can get a good job and from him plan a "guaranteed" retirement in old age. It lasted longer sufficient criterion plan every gram of family effort for generations so that young people can access a "title" to increase your chances to be employed. And it affects the healthy shame that the world look with a generous lens who has a job and other less pious who do not have it, which he lost or never wanted it.
What kind of interpretation answers appear before others as a person "unemployed"? What does that mean? If I could be understood as a slogan that is intended to carry a political message to power, probably hurt less, but also prove unhelpful. But if it wants to express a quality of "being" and "being" of the person, it is simply a mistake. No one can be called "unemployed" simply because at one point you are unemployed. "Unemployed" people who have no life, because they simply can no longer do anything are.
Moreover, how the story of who gets a job can be evaluated after having been long "unemployed" and celebrates the feeling of who had saved his life or out of the flames? What value can be assigned who becomes the life goal to get a job?
The intention is not to detract from anyone, more the opposite. Each person is worth much, much more, in his infinite universe of potential, than a job. And life is immeasurably greater than the work one performs. The idea also is to remove the specific value than a job has, the intention is to remind everyone the enormous value that each person represents, or in the worst case the fabulous value you can have if you understand things in the dimension They possess.
Every human being is unique and incomparable each person is endowed with gifts, skills and abilities that do not have their peers. And in the act of recognizing them, cultivate them and develop them, is the value of the contribution that can give himself and from there to others. Here the order is vital, because the value that each person has should benefit them first to herself, and then, as an effect of abundance, be of benefit to others. A person who can not sit and value not experience that in your own life, nothing valuable has to offer to its environment.
This has nothing to do with "offices" individual or "special knowledge". The idea of the value of one person transcends specific activities. A heladero that "appreciates and proudly" their craft in terms of perfection and excellence is more valuable than a doctor in economics that made the "right" or "as they had to do" things. The Value part first "see" what is, what you have and what you do and accordingly give a "price". The person who "appreciates and proudly" which has then can be judged on the same terms by others. Who expect appreciation and "price" are assigned by others, are subjected directly to the outside parameter, and if it is lower, it concludes that being your own value. This is the story of many employees who essentially have the value assigned to them by employers, because either always lacked self-worth or resigned.
For the person who identifies and cultivates its own value, employment is an option , it is not the end of history; It is also a choice between a vast array of possibilities, is finally an option that competes with much effort. This paradox has a simple explanation: who develops their own value has it in high esteem and rarely get a third party to "self - respecting" in the same dimension. The Employment also represents a major sacrifice of freedom and usually it is expensive for those who value themselves and their ability to contribute. Finally, the Employment pursues objectives add greater value to others and the person who "appreciates" their value does not always coincide with it.
On the other hand the person eigenvalue who decides to take employment as a means of personal and professional development is almost always an excellent employee, because it provides what's beyond what is required, it also works with peace of mind who is providing a service that is "seen" and not something that life is played. With the eigenvalue something happens like what self-love, it knows nothing of love that first one does not love himself and brings nothing of value who first is not aware of its own value.
Nor it has any sense intimately associate the Employment Work as implying that works only who has a job. This has no truth and is not correct, because actually works who brings something, and this not only happens in the world of employment. Employment who has no means to say "is not working" about anyway is doing is performing some contribution or value that inherently has. For hundreds of years the woman was classified as a person of "second category" only because his work took place in the home, and the man of the house was who deserved recognition as the main "kept" the family. This kind of cult of Employment and its association to work is a fallacy.
Another significant error is to link the "hard work" intense and without pause, responsibility and virtue. There is no relationship between productivity or value of work and "sweat of the brow". Not better worker who else is sacrificed or devotes more time to the work. Better working who get better results with less effort!And this also has a close relationship with the value of the person and the contribution it gives to their work. This other cult of "working day" for a limited number of working hours in certain places, and under the guidance of certain standards, it is another false argument and equivocal judgment. The quality contribution is multiform and essentially timeless, because it is strictly subject to the character of its value. One hour of work a cardiac surgeon worth as much as 1000 hours 10 dockers on a dock and probably worth less than the decision in 3 minutes making the general of an army in battle. There are no uniform parameters to qualify the work without strict consideration of the value of each of them in acertain context. And exactly the same applies to the employment in relation to all the other ways in which the value contribution of any person can perform.
Employment in itself is not a "livelihood", the value of knowledge, skills, skills and experience of people are. Production capacity is much more important than "land, capital or labor" linear economic model. The jobs are temporary, business experience or employment contracts they can also be, but the production capacity of the person accompanying the whole trip and it touches every season. And Production Capacity is obviously a product of the valuation process that everyone should do with its life. Production capacity can not only lead to quality employment is obtained, it can even lead to generate employment, in which case they are working on a higher stage.
Sad is the case of those companies that have made the cult of Employment an evaluation parameter of prosperity and welfare of the people, because in the usual (and normal) cycles of economic contraction, causing frustration and restlessness, and thrown up in addition, the creatures themselves who have helped shape.Because the person who loses his job or finally considered "unemployed", responsible for all its sorrows that society who introduced the dynamics. These societies are fragile, weak nations, low productivity and low competitive level.
When societies change the traditional question of "where do you work?" The most successful "What do you do?" When people do not even think for any reason to say "I'm in Paro" because eventually are not employed to service someone and when they themselves finally understand that the only certainty of a job is that one day end , a strategy based on the value of its people and Production Capacity society it engenders finally will glimpse.
In all this does not correspond expected to be the system that change is the person who must transform their conception of things, nothing deprives him of it. Finally, it is also a sign of comfort through life with a backpack of "accounts receivable".History shows again and again the magnificent ability of man to shape his destiny even under the most unfavorable conditions. If there were people who survived concentration camps unabridged, destructive wars, hunger and disease, some sensible has to some negative conditions the quality of your life as a result of which means a job. Man is not what happens !, and final tribute that each person will have when I leave this world can never be summarized in a "Here lies someone who never lacked a job."
If some of the species that conquered natural phenomena, which dominated the land and seas, exploring space and gradually discerns the mysteries that lurk is formed, then it is able to extract from life things that are worthwhile and not subject to the whims of fate. Through the veins of those great men circulated the same blood flowing in all, they were subject to the same or worse conditions than those afflicting today. Surely one thing still distinguishes: ATTITUDE. This is the most precious asset, this is what actually differentiates men from others. His absence is what determines someone is classified "Paro" and their presence that allows another build an empire with lemons life throws you.