When Moses decided to lead the Hebrews through the desert into a land of abundance and freedom, he not addressed his followers with the preaching of a tour guide; He not tells them to free themselves from slavery was to be the result of a peaceful walk. On the contrary, Moses warned them that only reach their destination after a long journey through inhospitable places, full of hardships endured, battles to fight and demands to meet.
When Denis Diderot and Jean le Rond d'Alembert undertook the titanic project of the Encyclopedia , they did with hobbyist spirit, convinced that prejudice, brutality and superstition would be easily wiped off the face of the Earth thanks to the influence of an enlightened generation. No. They did so moved by the sight of a multigenerational struggle and merciless by a free human society from the stranglehold of irrationality -to which joined with uncompromising devotion, risking both their freedom and their lives-.
When the Founding Fathers of the US decided to sign the Declaration of Independence , they knew very well that this symbolic act would not release instantly the thirteen colonies from British rule; They knew that the real struggle had just begun, and that a piece of paper would not protect them from enemy fire.
When Winston Churchill called to fight the Nazis "by sea, land and air , " he did not promise a quick and painless victory; on the contrary, to take over as Prime Minister of England in the most critical moment World War II, Churchill said: "I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat."
It is easy to identify the good leader: He tells the truth even if not popular to do so; never hides the price of freedom; and always inspires us to fight for what is right.
The good leader not appealing to popular draws crowds lies -any can do that- demagogue, nor benefit blindness indoctrinated to lead them into a minefield that he never would tread. On the contrary, the good leader challenges us, opens our eyes even if it hurts, and uses the same encandiladora light to ignite the flame of action in our hearts . Channeler and catalyst virtues, good leader is able to put our emotions, beliefs and skills in the service of a noble cause, but always with the truth as north.
The struggle for separation between money and state leaders has already forged that will be remembered for his powerful intellectual and moral influence-for motivated Glad we understand, disseminate and defend to the last breath principles underlying paradigm shift initiated by Bitcoin-. One of them is undoubtedly Zangelbert Bingledack (aka ForkiusMaximus ), the author of the text that we now have the pleasure to translate for you.
All my arguments against Core relate to the damage that this group is leading in the short term. But thanks to the concept of antifragilidad know that the short - term damage can make a stronger system in the long term , and therefore it should be welcomed as an essential challenge , as necessary part of the training-. Now we are part of that system, so it behooves us to fight to build that immunity, that strength.
Unfortunately, in the heat of battle many people lose sight of the big picture , and begin to imagine, as we are fighting an attempt to take the cockpit of Bitcoin, Bitcoin does have a cockpit. By focusing on the personalities easily we fall into ideas like this: "If only one of us had control ..." That's how we lose sight of decentralization and had joined the growing mass of weak hands; This is how we show that we had never really understood the nature of Bitcoin.
Bitcoin does not have a throne, and all the nonsense Core stem from the inability to recognize that. So strong is their propaganda that has also infected most detractors Core?
If so, Adam Back, Greg Maxwell and theymos are the best thing that could have happened to Bitcoin: the cheater identification of Core with Bitcoin is serving as an excellent filter to separate those who do not understand the system they defend and which have invested and this filter is so good that works on both sides of the debate by the block size.
The obstacle to understanding the nature of Bitcoin is growing and more difficult to overcome.
When Denis Diderot and Jean le Rond d'Alembert undertook the titanic project of the Encyclopedia , they did with hobbyist spirit, convinced that prejudice, brutality and superstition would be easily wiped off the face of the Earth thanks to the influence of an enlightened generation. No. They did so moved by the sight of a multigenerational struggle and merciless by a free human society from the stranglehold of irrationality -to which joined with uncompromising devotion, risking both their freedom and their lives-.
When the Founding Fathers of the US decided to sign the Declaration of Independence , they knew very well that this symbolic act would not release instantly the thirteen colonies from British rule; They knew that the real struggle had just begun, and that a piece of paper would not protect them from enemy fire.
When Winston Churchill called to fight the Nazis "by sea, land and air , " he did not promise a quick and painless victory; on the contrary, to take over as Prime Minister of England in the most critical moment World War II, Churchill said: "I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat."
It is easy to identify the good leader: He tells the truth even if not popular to do so; never hides the price of freedom; and always inspires us to fight for what is right.
The good leader not appealing to popular draws crowds lies -any can do that- demagogue, nor benefit blindness indoctrinated to lead them into a minefield that he never would tread. On the contrary, the good leader challenges us, opens our eyes even if it hurts, and uses the same encandiladora light to ignite the flame of action in our hearts . Channeler and catalyst virtues, good leader is able to put our emotions, beliefs and skills in the service of a noble cause, but always with the truth as north.
The struggle for separation between money and state leaders has already forged that will be remembered for his powerful intellectual and moral influence-for motivated Glad we understand, disseminate and defend to the last breath principles underlying paradigm shift initiated by Bitcoin-. One of them is undoubtedly Zangelbert Bingledack (aka ForkiusMaximus ), the author of the text that we now have the pleasure to translate for you.
All my arguments against Core relate to the damage that this group is leading in the short term. But thanks to the concept of antifragilidad know that the short - term damage can make a stronger system in the long term , and therefore it should be welcomed as an essential challenge , as necessary part of the training-. Now we are part of that system, so it behooves us to fight to build that immunity, that strength.
Unfortunately, in the heat of battle many people lose sight of the big picture , and begin to imagine, as we are fighting an attempt to take the cockpit of Bitcoin, Bitcoin does have a cockpit. By focusing on the personalities easily we fall into ideas like this: "If only one of us had control ..." That's how we lose sight of decentralization and had joined the growing mass of weak hands; This is how we show that we had never really understood the nature of Bitcoin.
Bitcoin does not have a throne, and all the nonsense Core stem from the inability to recognize that. So strong is their propaganda that has also infected most detractors Core?
If so, Adam Back, Greg Maxwell and theymos are the best thing that could have happened to Bitcoin: the cheater identification of Core with Bitcoin is serving as an excellent filter to separate those who do not understand the system they defend and which have invested and this filter is so good that works on both sides of the debate by the block size.
The obstacle to understanding the nature of Bitcoin is growing and more difficult to overcome.